Do All Cricketers Go To Heaven?

Sourav Ganguly has decided to enter the Dhoni-bashing scrum that inevitably formed after the Trent Bridge defeat.  And he’s brought his fists to the fight:

“I’m too fed up hearing this “time to recover” [excuse] – don’t play for India then, you know this is what it is, you have to come back and play a Test series,” Ganguly told Indian news channel Headlines Today / Aaj Tak. “And it was an important Test series, it was a marquee Test series to decide who was the No. 1 Test side in the world and you cannot say that. Okay you’ve lost and you haven’t played well, the matter ends there, just accept that and move on.”

The reaction comes after M.S. Dhoni said he would have liked a little more time between the Caribbean and England Tests. Ganguly’s criticism isn’t entirely fair for two reasons: a) If the England Tests were truly ‘marquee,’ surely the BCCI and the relevant authorities would have recognized that and put in more time for preparation (as Gary Kirsten insisted in the run-up to the South Africa series). And b) Dhoni has often said he expects the heavy schedule in response to questions about the workload. I’m too lazy to look up specific quotes, but I’m fairly sure his attitude has always been, “This is the way things are. We deal with it.”

Only after reading more of Ganguly’s interview do you get an inkling of the source of his hostility:

“You have to put it behind … You are 28, 29, 30, you won’t get to play for India all your life. Make the most when you get it, once it goes, you won’t get it back, even how much you want it.”

Ah, yes, there it is. Intimations of mortality. There was a time — not long ago, mind you — when Ganguly was included in a group known as the ‘Fab Four.’ Together with Laxman, Dravid and Tendulkar, Ganguly toured the world and pillaged and destroyed with only a bat in his hand. Then, he lost the captaincy and headed off to retirement before he was entirely ready. You see evidence of his restlessness in his IPL career; after a so-so bunch of seasons, his protege Yuvraj Singh had to rescue the ol’ fogy. Ganguly again disappointed.

It must be difficult for athletes to contemplate retirement. Poor Roger Federer is only in his late 20s, and already people refer to him like an old uncle who doesn’t know when to leave a party. Ganguly is older, yes, but he’s not even 40, and he has to suffer the fate of commenting on what his former colleagues are doing. He is forced to watch as his friends and teammates get to play his game, knowing fully well that no matter how much he wants it, he “won’t get it back.” Ganguly has always had an edge to him; he once said — with no small trace of bitterness — that no one ever talked about dropping Tendulkar (a quote he quickly masked with praise).  What Ganguly’s going through reads like an ancient Greek method of punishment, like having a thirsty man stare at a bunch of grapes just out of reach.

What does retirement mean for cricketers? It’s not exactly like death, because some do hang around in various forms. But the new relationship with fans is what makes it so unbearable. Retired cricketers are like grandmothers and relatives you know you should call, but don’t because you’re an awful person. Occasionally, they nag at you and say, “Remember all that I did for you? Remember when I broke my fingers for you? Remember when I hurt my body day after day for you?” And when they hear nothing back, all they get is an angry quote in Cricinfo.


5 thoughts on “Do All Cricketers Go To Heaven?

  1. Samir Chopra says:

    Nice work. But are you also suggesting embitterment in Ganguly?

  2. Ganguly spoiled his image himself by making a mockery of his legendary career.

  3. Cricblogger says:

    Ganguly was a great cricketer and fighter. He was the most successful captain upto his time now taken over by Dhoni. But somehow, he has taken the tag of villian in the indian cricketing circles

  4. Poorvi says:

    I didn’t get the feeling that he was ‘bashing’ Dhoni or being unfairly critical. I’ve enjoyed his commentary & found him to be mostly fair in this opinions. And I think his judgement of Dhoni is more acceptable since he was the most recent captain (aside from Dravid) & he would have a much better understanding of today’s conditions & pressures than a Shastri or Gavaskar.
    The only inconsistency I found in his interview is his opinion of younger batsmen & their failing against the short ball. I noticed that he didn’t mention Laxman or the ‘seniors’. Maybe because someone would have happily pointed out that he himself had a problem with short pitched deliveries!
    Also, I was watching the discussion when he mentioned that nobody would dare talk about about dropping Tendulkar. I really don’t see anything wrong with the comment. Former players & other ‘experts’ seem to talk about dropping anyone & everyone, but Sachin is never mentioned.

    • duckingbeamers says:


      I didn’t have a problem with him talking about dropping Tendulkar either. I just mentioned that someone as great as Ganguly may have an issue with how selective we are in talking about players being dropped.

      I did get the feeling he was bashing Dhoni. I like his commentary and I like his judgment, but — anyway, the point of this post wasn’t about Ganguly. It was more about retired cricketers and athletes and how they confront not being in the spotlight anymore. Cheers.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: