Indian Cricket Dominance and The Anxiety of Modernity

I realize most people have already moved on, but I wanted to add another small comment — grand title above aside — about India’s 1-0 series victory against the West Indies. A number of commenters brushed off my ‘meh’ framework to explain India’s approach to dominance, confusing it with a laid-back attitude and lack of commitment to the game. Maybe so, or maybe not, but the debate does evoke larger concerns about modernity and India’s new-found confidence.

Yes, I know it’s always very dangerous to try and tease out larger lessons about Indian society from cricket. I still cringe when I think about an article I read a few years ago that attempted to argue that Greg Chappell’s disastrous and overbearing tenure proved the uselessness of command-and-control socialist economics. A silly way to make a large point. But ask yourselves: why exactly are Indian fans so angry about a series victory, that too one pulled off with a second-string team? Part of the answer relates, I think, to the particular anxieties of modernity — if we live in a new age wherein the average Indian can believe that life is not to be endured, but remade and refashioned to his liking, why should anyone accept the draw?

I just finished reading Anand Giridharadas’ new book India Calling, a lovely book that examines this dilemma (in other contexts) at a deeply personal level. So, for instance, there’s the up-and-comer from a backwater Indian town, a self-educated man climbing the social ladder in a relentless confession of ambition.  On the one hand, this approach to life deserves applause; the improvement over the caste-based identities that have ruled for millennia is obvious. But on the other hand, there are complications, like the constant feeling that one could always strive to do more, do better, do faster.

Perhaps when people see the Indian team accept the draw, they see a tacit confirmation of mediocrity, of viewing life the way our elders used to — full of uncertainty, risk and sacrifice. There’s also a feeling, I suspect, of wasted potential. After all, the Indian team has been blessed with a bounty of batting talent over the past two decades, from Dravid to Ganguly to Tendulkar. With the sun setting on their careers, there is a legitimate question about whether or not the Indian cricket team used the batsmen’s talents to their fullest extent. Or did we basically waste the first decade of Tendulkar’s career?

There are two anxieties to untangle here: 1) Did we waste potential? This is a tough one for any Indian to answer, given the huge level of poverty that persists in the country. To be an Indian is to recognize the cruel realities of our world. But there’s also 2) a worry that we have not fully mastered modernity, and our success is not assured. What happens when Tendulkar and company leave? What happens if we make the wrong decisions now, and are bogged down by their consequences? What if we “lose” the 21st century? Things may have been easier and simpler when the draw was Indian cricket’s primary goal, but here we are — supposedly confident, ready to tame destiny…Will 1-0 be enough?

Advertisements

4 thoughts on “Indian Cricket Dominance and The Anxiety of Modernity

  1. Krishna says:

    I feel you have hit the right reasons here. Right now, there is an optimism and vibrancy about India’s prospects and “right” position in the world. We demand and are getting more respect.

    W.r.t. the 1-0 victory, a key point not to forget is that we also won 1-0 the last time. And while we had a second-string team, the West Indies are obviously weaker than the last time we played against them. So there is no “progress” this time.

    The wasted talent thing also seems to occur in other sports. I think most recently with Portugal and their “Golden Generation”. Problem with India is that they still have some mountains to climb – such as winning a Test series in Australia and in South Africa.

  2. I suppose, like many successful sides, India find themselves to be victims of raised expectations. It is no longer enough just to win – you must win well.

    The fact is this Windies series was a very odd one for India. Given the disparity in rankings, India always had a lot more to lose than they had to gain. To gain any real kudos they would had to have utterly steamrollered the Windies.

  3. Jawad says:

    Tendulkar looking to get his 100th century in the current tour of England. Why does India loose when Sachin Tendulkar scores a century. Read detailed analysis of Tendulkar’s centuries @ http://cricblogger.wordpress.com/

  4. Cricblogger says:

    Muhammad Yousuf and Mahela Jayawerdena both have ODI 15 centuries out of which both have 14 centuries in matches which their team won. Tendulkar has 48 centuries out of which only 33 centuries have helped india win. And out of these 33, 9 are against minnows like Namibia, Kenya and Zimbabwe.

    Why does india loose when Tendulkar scores a century. Read my detailed analysis @ http://www.cricblogger.wordpress.com

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: